I love the idea of using data analytics to know exactly where a student is and know when he or she is ready to move on. The School of One is a powerful idea where kids choose their modality for learning: how much support they want and need from the teacher. They can speed ahead if they are ready or take extra time they need to get it right. Teachers spend too much time grading papers and not enough time seeing what the results say about the student and how ready they are to move on. Computers and help. They are much better at crunching numbers than people. So why are we doing it on paper?
I think "digitizing what is already there" is simply a first step integrating technology. Teachers and students first need to learn how the digital tools work well. My district started with putting Smartboards and projectors into classrooms. Then they added document cameras. As this happened, multiple devices grew in the classroom for students to use.
"Digitizing what is already there" is a first step, but the progress cannot stop there. Teachers should take something they already teach and make it digital to build confidence and competence. Some teachers are technology "high-fliers" and some are luddites, often falling along generational lines.
Other teachers are afraid of the technology because the pressure is on to make sure scores don't fall on high-stakes, standardized, achievement tests while integrating whole new teaching practices and technology tools.
They need training, understanding, and confidence. As the technology tools are gradually integrated with training and support, the teaching can become better as the technology becomes smarter. One-to-one devices can the paradigm of learning in a classroom, but the teaching must also make the shift. Otherwise, the digitized classroom will still be stuck at the first step of "digitizing what is already there."